Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > Thanks for adding the details directly, downgrading the hard way is > what I am doing now using the past packages of libxml2 in Arch's > archives [1]. ArchLinux is a bit wrong in the fact of shipping a > package

Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-14 Thread Michael Paquier
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 6:46 PM, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hi Michael, > >> It's been one month since I have done some serious development with >> Archlinux (I was abroad and away from the laptop dedicated to that), >> and surprise, I can see failures in the PG

Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-14 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Michael, > I can confirm that I see the same errors on Arch Linux with latest > updates when PostgreSQL is compiled with --with-libxml and/or > --with-libxslt. I submitted a few details on bugs.archlinux.org [1] > since probably not all Arch Linux maintainers know how to reproduce an > issue.

Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-14 Thread Aleksander Alekseev
Hi Michael, > It's been one month since I have done some serious development with > Archlinux (I was abroad and away from the laptop dedicated to that), > and surprise, I can see failures in the PG regression tests, like the > following short extract (result compared to expected/xml.out): I can

Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-14 Thread Arthur Zakirov
Hello, On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 08:46:38PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > I can notice as well that no buildfarm machines are running ArchLinux > now, so that's one reason why this got undetected until now. My own > machines running Archlinux ARM have been unplugged for a full month, > and I can

Re: [HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-14 Thread Michael Paquier
On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 8:46 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > I have not investigated much this problem yet, but has somebody else > seen those diffs? Coming back to that... Downgrading down to 2.9.4+4+g3169602-1 is proving to put things back the way they should. Even

[HACKERS] Regressions failures with libxml2 on ArchLinux

2017-08-12 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, It's been one month since I have done some serious development with Archlinux (I was abroad and away from the laptop dedicated to that), and surprise, I can see failures in the PG regression tests, like the following short extract (result compared to expected/xml.out): SELECT