On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
s/segment/file/g?
We're already using file to mean something different *internally*,
don't we? And since
Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
to commit the patch for 9.2?
I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
committer has enough interest in getting it quickly
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
to commit the patch for 9.2?
I think the correct thing to do here
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 18:05, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
s/segment/file/g?
Yep, file might be more intuitive for a user than segment. Attached is
the
file version of the patch.
We're already using file to mean something different *internally*,
don't we? And since
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
s/segment/file/g?
We're already using file to mean something different *internally*,
don't we? And since pg_controldata shows fairly internal information,
I'm not sure this
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 05:06, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose to change pg_controldata so that it reports the name
of WAL file containing the latest checkpoint's REDO record, as follows:
$ pg_controldata $PGDATA
...
Latest checkpoint's REDO
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
We can use
pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot be executed in
the standby. Another problem is that pg_xlogfile_name
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:51, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
We can use
pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
the format of an existing row, in order not to break scripts and
programs that are parsing the previous output?
Good idea! What row name should we
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
the format of an existing row, in order not to break scripts and
programs
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
Hi,
I'd like to propose to change pg_controldata so that it reports the name
of WAL file containing the latest checkpoint's REDO record, as follows:
$ pg_controldata $PGDATA
...
Latest checkpoint's REDO location:0/16D6ACC (file
00010001)
Latest checkpoint's
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
We can use
pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot be executed in
the standby. Another problem is that pg_xlogfile_name always uses
current timeline for the calculation, so if the reported timeline
17 matches
Mail list logo