On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 02:06:48PM -0400, Jay Levitt wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >I am again requesting the addition of options to tools/git_changelog so
> >I can more easily produce the release notes. I asked for this during
> >9.1 development and it was rejected. I am currently using my own
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I am again requesting the addition of options to tools/git_changelog so
I can more easily produce the release notes. I asked for this during
9.1 development and it was rejected. I am currently using my own
custom version of the tool, but have to merge community improvements
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:19:04PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Also consider that A is usually the big, clear commit message, and B,C,D
> are just minor adjustments with more brief commits, which might require
> adjusting the release note item for feature A. When they are in
> newest-first order
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 03:19:04PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:05:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
> > > question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:05:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
> > question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
>
> 50% I think. The only thing that's really concerning me here is t
On 04/26/2012 02:54 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
50% I think. The only thing that's rea
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
>> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
>
> 50% I think. The only thing that's really concerning me here is that
> the r
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I agree adding rarely-used options to a tool doesn't make sense, but the
> question is what percentage of the git_changelog userbase am I?
50% I think. The only thing that's really concerning me here is that
the reverse-sort option seems likely to be bug-inducing, and I r
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 06:59:18PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 18:56, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian writes:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > --details-after Show branch
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 18:56, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian writes:
>>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> --details-after Show branch and author info after the commit description
>>
I don't understand th
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
--details-after Show branch and author info after the commit description
>
>>> I don't understand the point of that.
>
>> The release notes have the author at
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 01:26:16AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> --details-after Show branch and author info after the commit description
>
> >> I don't understand the point of that.
>
> > The release notes have
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> --details-after Show branch and author info after the commit description
>> I don't understand the point of that.
> The release notes have the author at the end of the text.
So? The committer is very often no
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 05:09:04PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > The attached patch gives you an idea of what I want to add.
>
> This patch doesn't seem to be against HEAD?
Yes, if people approve, I will work on a current patch against HEAD.
> > --details-after Show bra
Bruce Momjian writes:
> The attached patch gives you an idea of what I want to add.
This patch doesn't seem to be against HEAD?
> --details-after Show branch and author info after the commit description
I don't understand the point of that.
> --master-only Show commits made exclusive
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am again requesting the addition of options to tools/git_changelog so
> I can more easily produce the release notes. I asked for this during
> 9.1 development and it was rejected. I am currently using my own
> custom version of the tool,
I am again requesting the addition of options to tools/git_changelog so
I can more easily produce the release notes. I asked for this during
9.1 development and it was rejected. I am currently using my own
custom version of the tool, but have to merge community improvements
into the tool every ye
17 matches
Mail list logo
