On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
$ ./pg_archivecleanup -x bz2 /tmp 000100010058
Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional.
Perhaps I'm
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
$ ./pg_archivecleanup -x bz2 /tmp 000100010058
Hmm, but I thought that the idea was that the extension was optional.
Perhaps I'm missing something but I don't think the previous patch
will complain about
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Sorry, here's the patch rebased and with the suggestion from Alex.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Sorry, here's the patch rebased and with the suggestion from Alex.
Which reminds me, I never thank him for the review (shame on me) :D
with the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Sorry, here's the patch rebased and with the suggestion from Alex.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Sorry, here's the patch rebased and with the suggestion from Alex.
Which reminds me, I never thank him for the review (shame on me) :D
with the patch this time
This may be a stupid idea, but it seems to me that it
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The smaller step of automatically stripping the specified suffix from the
input file name, when it matches the one we've told the program to expect,
seems like a usability improvement unlikely to lead to bad things though.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The smaller step of automatically stripping the specified suffix from the
input file name, when it matches the one we've told the program to expect,
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The smaller step of automatically stripping the specified suffix from the
On 02/01/2012 07:53 AM, Alex Shulgin wrote:
One problem I've found while trying the example workflow is this:
~/local/postgresql/HEAD$ ./bin/pg_archivecleanup -d -x .gz data/archive/
00010002.0020.backup.gz
pg_archivecleanup: invalid filename input
Try pg_archivecleanup
Hello,
This is my first patch review ever, so please bear with me.
The patch[1] is in the context diff format and applies cleanly to
current git HEAD. Documentation is updated by the patch.
The code does implement what's the patch is supposed to do.
Do we want that? According to Greg's
12 matches
Mail list logo
