[HACKERS] SSPI vs MingW

2007-07-23 Thread Magnus Hagander
I just came across yet another place where MingW isn't compatible with the windows api. Specifically, their libsecur32.a file lacks at least one function that is needed to implement SSPI authentication. The way I can see it, there are three ways to solve it: 1) Simply state that SSPI

Re: [HACKERS] SSPI vs MingW

2007-07-23 Thread Dave Page
Magnus Hagander wrote: I just came across yet another place where MingW isn't compatible with the windows api. Specifically, their libsecur32.a file lacks at least one function that is needed to implement SSPI authentication. The way I can see it, there are three ways to solve it: Ugh. 1)

Re: [HACKERS] SSPI vs MingW

2007-07-23 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:06:59AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: I just came across yet another place where MingW isn't compatible with the windows api. Specifically, their libsecur32.a file lacks at least one function that is needed to implement SSPI authentication. The

Re: [HACKERS] SSPI vs MingW

2007-07-23 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Dave Page wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: I just came across yet another place where MingW isn't compatible with the windows api. Specifically, their libsecur32.a file lacks at least one function that is needed to implement SSPI authentication. The way I can see it, there are three ways to

Re: [HACKERS] SSPI vs MingW

2007-07-23 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Magnus Hagander wrote: 1) Simply state that SSPI authentication in the backend cannot be built with mingw, and require msvc build for it (the msvc api follows the windows api, which is hardly surprising). We could add an autoconf test for it that'd pick up