Re: [HACKERS]WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > If we don't need c4 as an index scankey, we don't need any btree opclass on > it. > But we still want to have it in covering index for queries like > > SELECT c4 FROM tbl WHERE c1=1000; // uses the

Re: [HACKERS]WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Finally, completed patch "covering_unique_3.0.patch" is here. It includes the functionality discussed above in the thread, regression tests and docs update. I think it's quite ready for review. _Future work:_ Besides that, I'd like to get feedback about attached patch

Re: [HACKERS]WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

08.10.2015 19:31, Thom Brown пишет: On 8 October 2015 at 16:18, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: Hi hackers, I'm working on a patch that allows to combine covering and unique functionality for btree indexes. Previous discussion was here: 1) Proposal thread 2)

[HACKERS]WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

Hi hackers, I'm working on a patch that allows to combine covering and unique functionality for btree indexes. _Previous discussion was here:_ 1) Proposal thread 2) Message with proposal clarification

Re: [HACKERS]WIP: Covering + unique indexes.

On 8 October 2015 at 16:18, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > > Hi hackers, > > I'm working on a patch that allows to combine covering and unique > functionality for btree indexes. > > Previous discussion was here: > 1) Proposal thread > 2) Message with proposal

<    1   2