Re: [HACKERS] a new problem in MERGE

2010-11-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: Boxuan Zhai wrote: I have plan to fix the above two bugs together. (in fact, I have already started coding in merge_v202 edition). My question is how should I make my update be consistent with yours. Is it possible for

Re: [HACKERS] a new problem in MERGE

2010-11-14 Thread Greg Smith
Boxuan Zhai wrote: I have plan to fix the above two bugs together. (in fact, I have already started coding in merge_v202 edition). My question is how should I make my update be consistent with yours. Is it possible for you to give me an edition that I can work on? I just got this reconciled

[HACKERS] a new problem in MERGE

2010-10-31 Thread Boxuan Zhai
Dear Greg, How are you? As we talked last week, there is a bug about the origslot field assertion. TRAP: FailedAssertion(!(epqstate-origslot != ((void *)0)), File: execMain.c, Line: 1732) I checked my codes and found the reason of this problem. In the original process of ExecModifyTable()