On 2/21/17 10:18, Tom Lane wrote:
> Based on some not-fun I had along the way to that, I think it would be
> a good idea to do the Python version check a bit earlier than you have
> here. The shlib search in PGAC_CHECK_PYTHON_EMBED_SETUP is pretty fragile
> and version-dependent, which means that
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On 2/19/17 23:33, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
>> Thanks! Looks like buildfarm is green again.
> Thank. I have committed the patch to drop Python 2.3 support.
I spent some time last night building a (rather makeshift) python 2.4.1
installation on prairiedog, which I will now
On 2/19/17 23:33, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> Thanks! Looks like buildfarm is green again.
Thank. I have committed the patch to drop Python 2.3 support.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via p
Hi,
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 16:20 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, that test is checking which week-of-the-year a Sunday midnight is
> considered to fall into. There could be an edge-case bug in Tcl itself,
> or a problem with the time zone data, or maybe if you're setting LC_TIME
> to tr_TR, that c
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= writes:
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 13:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or conceivably it's timezone dependent?
> FWIW, the timezone of the server is GMT+3, if that is what you are asking.
Well, that test is checking which week-of-the-year a Sunday midnight is
consider
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 13:48 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmph. I can't see any relevant-looking source changes between 8.4.13
> and 8.4.15, which I have laying about here and which works fine.
> I wonder if Red Hat is carrying some distro-specific patch that
> breaks this case?
Just downlo
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= writes:
> On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 10:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Relevant question: what version of tcl is installed on those?
> 8.4.13 is installed.
Hmph. I can't see any relevant-looking source changes between 8.4.13
and 8.4.15, which I have laying about here
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 10:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Relevant question: what version of tcl is installed on those?
8.4.13 is installed.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz
I wrote:
> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= writes:
>> arapaima(x86) and aholehole(x86_64) are the new animals. They are running the
>> buildfarm script now.
> ... and failing. I wonder what is wrong with tcl_date_week()?
> Will look for the explanation in a bit.
Relevant question: what versi
Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnd=FCz?= writes:
> arapaima(x86) and aholehole(x86_64) are the new animals. They are running the
> buildfarm script now.
... and failing. I wonder what is wrong with tcl_date_week()?
Will look for the explanation in a bit.
regards, tom lane
--
Hi,
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 08:21 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I will wait for that before proceeding.
Sorry for the delay, I also had to build a newer flex RPM before proceeding.
arapaima(x86) and aholehole(x86_64) are the new animals. They are running the
buildfarm script now.
Regards,
--
Hi Peter,
On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 08:21 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I have CentOS 5 instances running on buildfarm. I'll register them via
> > buildfarm.pg.org soon.
>
> I will wait for that before proceeding.
Sorry for the delay. Machines are ready, I think I can prepare the buildfarm
ins
On 2/8/17 10:35, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 09:16 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> It appears that we don't have anything running 2.4. A RHEL/CentOS 5
>> system with standard components would be a good addition to the build farm.
>
> I have CentOS 5 instances running on buildfa
On 2/7/17 10:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Peter Eisentraut writes:
I would like to propose that we drop support for Python 2.3.
...
We do have buildfarm coverage on prairiedog. However, that runs a >10
year old operating system, so I think it is not representing real usage.
I have no particular obj
On 02/07/2017 11:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> I would like to propose that we drop support for Python 2.3.
>> ...
>> We do have buildfarm coverage on prairiedog. However, that runs a >10
>> year old operating system, so I think it is not representing real usage.
> I have
Hi,
On Wed, 2017-02-08 at 09:16 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> It appears that we don't have anything running 2.4. A RHEL/CentOS 5
> system with standard components would be a good addition to the build farm.
I have CentOS 5 instances running on buildfarm. I'll register them via
buildfarm.pg.
On 2/7/17 11:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm, is there anything running 2.4 in the buildfarm? If we're going to
> claim support for 2.4, we'd be well advised to test it.
It appears that we don't have anything running 2.4. A RHEL/CentOS 5
system with standard components would be a good addition to th
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> I would like to propose that we drop support for Python 2.3.
> ...
> We do have buildfarm coverage on prairiedog. However, that runs a >10
> year old operating system, so I think it is not representing real usage.
I have no particular objection to dropping 2.3 support,
18 matches
Mail list logo
