On 16 June 2016 at 00:40, Jimmy wrote:
>
> (1) I can (and do) use psql, pg_isready seems lighter and since it already
> supports credentials and DB name, I see very little harm for pg_isready
> to say back whether user logged IN or not using these credentials.
>
>
> (2)
yup, it does for (1)
:-)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:53 AM Imre Samu wrote:
> >Why I need it? There is tiny window between postgres being ready to
> accept connections
> >and final scripts which create initial user/database.
> >Ideally having option to say "postgres is
>Why I need it? There is tiny window between postgres being ready to accept
connections
>and final scripts which create initial user/database.
>Ideally having option to say "postgres is ready after specific user can
login to specific database" would be ideal.
temporary - the official
On 06/15/2016 09:30 AM, David G. Johnston wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jimmy
(1) I can (and do) use psql, pg_isready seems lighter and since it already
supports credentials and DB name, I see very little harm for pg_isready to
say back whether user logged IN or not using these credentials.
(2) timeout is not the same - timeout does not retry, its a simple timeout
in case
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Jimmy wrote:
> Not sure if this was discussed in the past and decided it does not belong
> to pg_isready utility
>
> I am using pg_isready in dockerized development environment as part of
> docker-compose. Simply say I have POSTGRES
Not sure if this was discussed in the past and decided it does not belong
to pg_isready utility
I am using pg_isready in dockerized development environment as part of
docker-compose. Simply say I have POSTGRES container and APP container. I
use pg_isready inside app container and wait till