On 07/01/2013 07:53 AM, Claudio Freire wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, james ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
have left it very clear they don't intend to fix that, as they
On 2013-06-30 22:43:52 -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
Not only that, the CPython interpreter is rather fuzzy about the
division between interpreters. You can initialize multiple
interpreters, but they share a lot of state, so you can never fully
separate them. You'd have some state from the
On 7/1/13 1:29 AM, james wrote:
Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used
outside
of the database as well as inside it, would it be reasonable to consider
'promoting' pllua?
You can start promoting pllua by making it work with current PostgreSQL
versions. It hasn't
Hi all,
Claudio Freire wrote:
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, james ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
have left it very clear they don't intend to fix that, as they don't
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:15 -0400, Luis Carvalho wrote:
The project is maintained -- I don't know how to say when something is
well-maintained, but small frequency of code updates is not one of my
criteria;
The bug tracker contains bugs about build problems with PG 8.4, 9.2, and
9.3, which
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:15 -0400, Luis Carvalho wrote:
The project is maintained -- I don't know how to say when something is
well-maintained, but small frequency of code updates is not one of my
criteria;
The bug tracker contains bugs about build problems with
On 07/02/2013 01:54 AM, Luis Carvalho wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 18:15 -0400, Luis Carvalho wrote:
The project is maintained -- I don't know how to say when something is
well-maintained, but small frequency of code updates is not one of my
criteria;
The bug tracker
I'm reading through plperl and plpython implementations and I don't
understand the way they work.
Comments for plperl say that there are two interpreters (trusted and
untrusted) for each user session, and they are stored in a hash.
Plpython version looks quite different, there is no such global
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 01:49:53PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
I'm reading through plperl and plpython implementations and I don't
understand the way they work.
Comments for plperl say that there are two interpreters (trusted and
untrusted) for each user session, and they are stored in a hash.
On 06/30/2013 07:49 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
I'm reading through plperl and plpython implementations and I don't
understand the way they work.
Comments for plperl say that there are two interpreters (trusted and
untrusted) for each user session, and they are stored in a hash.
Plpython version
On 30 June 2013 14:13, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 06/30/2013 07:49 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
I'm reading through plperl and plpython implementations and I don't
understand the way they work.
Comments for plperl say that there are two interpreters (trusted and
untrusted) for
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no plpython,
only plpythonu - hence only one interpreter per backend is needed.
Is there any track of the discussion that there is no way to make the
sandbox? I managed
On 06/30/2013 08:18 AM, Szymon Guz wrote:
python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no
plpython, only plpythonu - hence only one interpreter per backend
is needed.
Is there any track of the discussion that there is no way to make the
sandbox? I managed to
On 30 June 2013 14:31, Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no
plpython,
only plpythonu - hence only one interpreter per backend is needed.
Is there
On 2013-06-30 14:42:24 +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
On 30 June 2013 14:31, Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
python does not any any sort of reliable sandbox, so there is no
plpython,
only plpythonu - hence only
On 30 June 2013 14:45, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-06-30 14:42:24 +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
On 30 June 2013 14:31, Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
python does not any any sort of
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On 2013-06-30 14:42:24 +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
On 30 June 2013 14:31, Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 02:18:07PM +0200, Szymon Guz wrote:
python does not any any sort of
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
have left it very clear they don't intend to fix that, as they don't
consider it a bug. It's just how it is.
Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used outside
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:29 AM, james ja...@mansionfamily.plus.com wrote:
On 01/07/2013 02:43, Claudio Freire wrote:
In essence, you'd have to use another implementation. CPython guys
have left it very clear they don't intend to fix that, as they don't
consider it a bug. It's just how it is.
19 matches
Mail list logo