Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
something authoritative about which and what.
Documentation follows, but first the summary:
FreeBSD: __FreeBSD__
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On l?r, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS, which was Bruce's main
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On l?r, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS,
Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not even too sure what bsdi is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
too. A search of our code finds
contrib/pg_upgrade/file.c: 248: #elif defined(freebsd) || defined(bsdi) ||
defined(__darwin__) || defined(openbsd)
src/backend/utils/misc/ps_status.c: 67: #elif
Giles Lean wrote:
Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
something authoritative about which and what.
Documentation follows, but first the
The recently added contrib/pg_upgrade code contains this bit:
/*
* scandir() is originally from BSD 4.3, which had the third argument as
* non-const. Linux and other C libraries have updated it to use a const.
*
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not even too sure what bsdi is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
too. A search of our code finds
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not even too sure what bsdi is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
too. A search of our code finds
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:15 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'm not even too sure what bsdi is, but I'm suspicious of that branch
too. A search of our code finds
It's a
On lör, 2010-05-15 at 00:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I suppose that at least some of the *BSD herd really do predefine some
of the symbols being attributed to them here, but I would like to see
something authoritative about which and what.
On lör, 2010-05-15 at 00:23 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
It's a commercial distribution of BSD. I remember it being pretty
nice when I used it 10+ years ago, but it sounds like it's dead now.
BSDI is the company that produced BSD/OS, which was Bruce's main
development environment at some point,
11 matches
Mail list logo
