Gevik Babakhani wrote:
After reading the thread of 2004 regarding user quotas, I understand
why the discussion moved towards having a tablespace quota as a
solution.
My reason to start this discussion was due the need of controlling
database size. Having tablespace quotas could allow one to
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonah H. Harris
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:55 AM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Gevik Babakhani; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] quotas once again
On Nov 28, 2007 8:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and
IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected).
Does anyone know to which direction we went for having quotas?
Regards,
Gevik
Gevik Babakhani
PostgreSQL NL
Hello
this patch was commited
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php
Regards
Pavel Stehule
On 28/11/2007, Gevik Babakhani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and
IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
this patch was commited
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php
Uh, he was asking about quotas, not quotes. No, we don't have user
quotas yet.
---
Regards
On 28/11/2007, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hello
this patch was commited
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-11/msg00530.php
Uh, he was asking about quotas, not quotes. No, we don't have user
quotas yet.
I am blind. I am sorry. Its
Uh, he was asking about quotas, not quotes. No, we don't
have user quotas yet.
Thank you.
I read we have a Allow per-tablespace quotas. But the more I think about
this
the more complex it gets. I guess implementing a user quota is a very
different story
than quotas per-tablespace.
Jonah H. Harris escribió:
On Nov 28, 2007 3:21 PM, Gevik Babakhani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and
IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected).
Does anyone know to which direction we went for having quotas?
On Nov 28, 2007 3:21 PM, Gevik Babakhani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sometime ago there was a discussion about user/database quota and
IIRC there was also some patch for this (probably got rejected).
Does anyone know to which direction we went for having quotas?
I had written a patch for user
On Nov 28, 2007 8:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you publish it in pgsql-patches? If so, it can be fished from
there.
Unfortunately, no. IIRC, I believe the topic moved to being
non-user-based quotas and more tablespace-oriented.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software
10 matches
Mail list logo