On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Kevin Grittner
wrote:
> Jeff Davis wrote:
>
>> Seriously though, I think that we should stick as closely to the
>> letter of the standard as possible here (or, if there is
>> ambiguity, pick one reasonable interpretation). NULL semantics are
>> confusing enough wit
Jeff Davis wrote:
> Seriously though, I think that we should stick as closely to the
> letter of the standard as possible here (or, if there is
> ambiguity, pick one reasonable interpretation). NULL semantics are
> confusing enough without everyone making their own subtle tweaks.
+1
If the s
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 09:44 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > My take on this is that we are stuck with the status quo. If a
> change
> > must be done, the 'is null' change should be reverted to un-standard
> > behavior. The SQL standard position on this issue is, IMNSHO, on
> > mars.
>
> As someone w
On Oct 28, 2010, at 11:41 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Pavel Stehule writes:
>>> I am checking PLpgSQL ToDo topics, and I am not sure if this topic
>>> isn't done. And if not, then I would to get some detail.
>>
>> I think that thread petered o
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule writes:
>> I am checking PLpgSQL ToDo topics, and I am not sure if this topic
>> isn't done. And if not, then I would to get some detail.
>
> I think that thread petered out because we didn't have consensus on
> what the behavior o
Pavel Stehule writes:
> I am checking PLpgSQL ToDo topics, and I am not sure if this topic
> isn't done. And if not, then I would to get some detail.
I think that thread petered out because we didn't have consensus on
what the behavior ought to be. It goes back to whether there is
supposed to be
Hello
I am checking PLpgSQL ToDo topics, and I am not sure if this topic
isn't done. And if not, then I would to get some detail.
Now there is possible to test row's variable on NULL, now it is
possible to assign NULL to row variable. What we can do more?
a) There is small difference between ret