On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:37 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Geoff Winkless pgsqlad...@geoff.dj writes:
While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a
reproducible server segfault.
Hm, looks like commit 1345cc67bbb014209714af32b5681b1e11eaf964 is to
Geoff Winkless pgsqlad...@geoff.dj writes:
While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a
reproducible server segfault.
Hm, looks like commit 1345cc67bbb014209714af32b5681b1e11eaf964 is to
blame: memory management for the plpgsql cast cache needs to be more
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Geoff Winkless pgsqlad...@geoff.dj wrote:
While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a
reproducible server segfault.
[...]
Hope someone can get something useful from the above. Any questions, please
ask.
A test case is more than
Hi all
While doing some testing of 9.5a one of my colleagues (not on list) found a
reproducible server segfault.
We've broken it down to a minimal script to reproduce below.
Reproduced on both machines on which we've installed 9.5 so far (both built
from source since we don't have any RHEL7
