On 7/20/10, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2010-07-18 at 09:42 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be
in favor of doing it in the first place:
On tis, 2010-07-20 at 13:31 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Standard_conforming_strings
There is two sorts of support:
1. Detect stdstr on startup and use that setting.
2. Detect online changes to stdstr and follow them.
AFAICS psycopg does not support 2).
On sön, 2010-07-18 at 09:42 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be
in favor of doing it in the first place: Either we just flip the
default, make a note in the release
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2010-07-18 at 09:42 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be
in favor of doing it in the first
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On sön, 2010-07-18 at 09:42 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think there are two ways we can
On ons, 2010-07-14 at 10:48 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
An actual plan here might look like let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it ...
Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be
in favor of doing it in the first place: Either we just flip the
default, make a note in the release notes, and see what happens. Or we
spend some time now and make,
David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com writes:
On Jul 18, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I think there are two ways we can do this, seeing that most appear to be
in favor of doing it in the first place: Either we just flip the
default, make a note in the release notes, and see what
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
An actual plan here might look like let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 12:30 AM, Richard Huxton d...@archonet.com wrote:
Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying WARNING:
The PGDG currently plan to change this setting's default in 9.1?
Well, mostly that we could change our
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
An actual plan here might look like let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it ...
Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
cycles on it.
Should we do this?
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
An actual plan here might look like let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it ...
Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
cycles on
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
An actual plan here might look like let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it ...
Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha
On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
An actual plan here might look like let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it ...
Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha
Are we going to turn on standard_conforming_strings for 8.3? We
discussed the idea when we added it in 8.1, and enabled the backslash
warning in 8.2. We have gotten almost no pushback on the warning, so it
seems enabling it might be good. Right now, for default
postgresql.conf, users are
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are we going to turn on standard_conforming_strings for 8.3?
I'd be inclined to wait a bit longer, i.e., 8.4, seeing that this is
intended to be a short release cycle. 8.2 has not been out long enough
to draw any meaningful conclusions about whether we
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are we going to turn on standard_conforming_strings for 8.3?
I'd be inclined to wait a bit longer, i.e., 8.4, seeing that this is
intended to be a short release cycle. 8.2 has not been out long enough
to draw any meaningful
I see that in CVS head, if you turn on standard_conforming_strings,
it still whines about backslashes:
regression=# set standard_conforming_strings to 1;
SET
regression=# select '1234\5678';
WARNING: nonstandard use of escape in a string literal
LINE 1: select '1234\5678';
^
HINT:
18 matches
Mail list logo
