Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: Actually, there's another way we could do this. Instead of creating pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute and moving all of the catalog entries for the shared relations into those tables, we could consider leaving the

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: Actually, there's another way we could do this.   Instead of creating pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute and moving all of the catalog

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38 -0400 2010: Uh, how does this work when you change the entries for shared

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of vie may 21 10:20:38

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-24 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org wrote: Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun may 24 17:18:21 -0400 2010: Well, I might be missing something here, but pg_class already IS database-specific.  If you change

[HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote (in reply to Tom Lane):  If we create, e.g. pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute, then we can un-nail the catalogs you just nailed to make the authentication process able to work without selecting a database. Actually,

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-21 Thread Pavel Stehule
2010/5/21 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com: On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote (in reply to Tom Lane):  If we create, e.g. pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute, then we can un-nail the catalogs you just nailed to make the authentication process able to

Re: [HACKERS] unnailing shared relations (was Re: global temporary tables)

2010-05-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/5/21 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com: On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote (in reply to Tom Lane):  If we create, e.g. pg_shared_class and pg_shared_attribute, then we can