Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Greg, First, thanks for helping out with the CF. * Greg Smith (g...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: That leaves only 1 patch where I have no idea who will commit it: access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement I'll take a look at this. Thanks again, Stephen signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that Robert has been working on those quite a bit. I'm putting him down as the committer on this last one. I missed that one, now committed. But just BTW, you kind of messed up that CommitFest entry. The link you added as a new version of the patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
On 7/23/13 9:06 AM, Robert Haas wrote: But just BTW, you kind of messed up that CommitFest entry. The link you added as a new version of the patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock. Fixed now, since I find myself looking back through history on submissions often enough to care about it being right. My eyes were starting to glaze over by the end of staring at this flock. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant USg...@2ndquadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com wrote: On 7/23/13 9:06 AM, Robert Haas wrote: But just BTW, you kind of messed up that CommitFest entry. The link you added as a new version of the patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock. Fixed now, since I find myself looking back through history on submissions often enough to care about it being right. My eyes were starting to glaze over by the end of staring at this flock. Cool. I'm pretty sure that's the correct collective noun for patches. Right? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
After pushes from a few people, the remaining submissions are now waiting for commit. I updated each of those to have the latest info in the CF app, and tried to identify what committers have already looked at them. Access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement: ? Add more regression tests mostly for ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY .. ADD/DROP: ? Robert Haas gave a quick review last week that's generated an update since. But that looks it was just a quick scan for issues. Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already) SQL Command to edit postgresql.conf (ALTER SYSTEM patch): Alvaro volunteered to look at this if no one else gets to it first. UNNEST() (and other functions) WITH ORDINALITY: Greg Stark -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant USg...@2ndquadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes: Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already) Really I should do that one, but it seems like all my available cycles have been going into bug fixing lately :-( regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Tom Lane wrote: Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes: Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already) Really I should do that one, but it seems like all my available cycles have been going into bug fixing lately :-( Yeah, I only did a first pass over that patch and was expecting you would pick it up. -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
On 7/22/13 10:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Greg Smith g...@2ndquadrant.com writes: Remove unused targets from plan: Alvaro? (He reviewed it already) Really I should do that one, but it seems like all my available cycles have been going into bug fixing lately :-( I just put you down as the committer on it, given Alvaro waved that way too. A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that Robert has been working on those quite a bit. I'm putting him down as the committer on this last one. If the CF drags on a bit due to committer time being spent on bugs, given the date here I think that's OK. I would put next week as a loose target for finishing these off. I worry a lot less about committers keeping to their schedules than when there are 50 regular contributors still moving around. That leaves only 1 patch where I have no idea who will commit it: access to calls stack from GET DIAGNOSTICS statement -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant USg...@2ndquadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
