Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in
> > the
> > documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> > dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> > vacuum commands outp
> The current terminology of live and dead is already used in many places in
> the
> documentation and in userspace; mostly around the need for maintainance of
> dead tuples within tables, reindex cleaning up dead pages, and even in the
> vacuum commands output (n dead tuples cannot be removed
On Tuesday 26 December 2006 23:12, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > >> I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better
> > >> to me. What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?
> > >
> > > In my mind,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better to
> >> me. What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?
>
> > In my mind, visible really means "visible to anyone", and expired means
> > visibl
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I'm not really convinced that Bruce's proposed names seem any better to
>> me. What's wrong with "dead" and "live"?
> In my mind, visible really means "visible to anyone", and expired means
> visible to no one.
Um ... surely, v
"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2006-12-26 at 13:59 -0800, Glen Parker wrote:
>> I'd love to see this back patched into 8.2.1 if possible.
> Probably not. We typically do not introduce new features into back
> releases.
And since this one would require an initdb, there is
