[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here comes the latest version (version 7) of the patch to handle large
result sets with psql. As previously discussed, a cursor is used
for SELECT queries when \set FETCH_COUNT some_value 0
Applied with revisions ... I didn't like the fact that the code was
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
commands sent with \g use a cursor. This patch changes SendQuery
so that *every* command executed via psql is treated this way.
That's what I remembered. I don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
here comes the latest version (version 7) of the patch to handle large
result sets with psql. As previously discussed, a cursor is used
for SELECT queries when \set FETCH_COUNT some_value 0
Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
commands
Tom Lane wrote:
Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
commands sent with \g use a cursor. This patch changes SendQuery
so that *every* command executed via psql is treated this way.
That's what I remembered. I don't think we want to introduce a
difference
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Wait a minute. What I thought we had agreed to was a patch to make
commands sent with \g use a cursor.
I am confused. I assume \g and ; should be affected, like Peter says.
Tom, what *every* command are you
