On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:29:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>> > Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
>> > things from the list of open items. I don't think all of the things
>> > listed i
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:29:06AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
> > things from the list of open items. I don't think all of the things
> > listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what n
Robert Haas writes:
> Seems OK, but I think we need to work a little harder on evicting some
> things from the list of open items. I don't think all of the things
> listed in the blockers section really are, and I'm not sure what needs
> to be done about some of the things that are there.
I've g
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> It looks like the most optimistic schedule we could possibly make,
> assuming no show-stopper bugs are reported, is:
>
> * Wrap beta3 on August 2 for release Monday Aug 6
>
> * RC1 two weeks later (release Aug 20)
>
> * 9.2.0 two weeks after that
I wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan writes:
>> On 21 July 2012 08:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until
> September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not
> release final until mid/late September. Is that what we want?
>> Pe
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> On 21 July 2012 08:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until
>> September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not
>> release final until mid/late September. Is that what we want?
> Personally I
On 21 July 2012 08:08, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until
> September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not
> release final until mid/late September. Is that what we want?
Personally I had hoped to see an earlier rel