Re: [HACKERS] Bug in two-phase transaction recovery

2016-09-09 Thread Simon Riggs
On 8 September 2016 at 11:18, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 8 September 2016 at 07:43, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich >> wrote: >>> Some time ago two-phase state file format was

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in two-phase transaction recovery

2016-09-08 Thread Simon Riggs
On 8 September 2016 at 07:43, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich > wrote: >> Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable size >> GID, >> but several places that read that files

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in two-phase transaction recovery

2016-09-08 Thread Pavan Deolasee
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich > wrote: > > Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable > size GID, > > but several places that read that

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in two-phase transaction recovery

2016-09-08 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Stas Kelvich wrote: > Some time ago two-phase state file format was changed to have variable size > GID, > but several places that read that files were not updated to use new offsets. > Problem > exists in master and 9.6 and can be