On 2014-02-19 00:55:03 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Andres Freund
> wrote:
> > Was there an index only scan or just a index scan? Any chance of a
> > corrupted index?
>
> Just an index scan. I think it's unlikely to be a corrupt index,
> because the customer
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Was there an index only scan or just a index scan? Any chance of a
> corrupted index?
Just an index scan. I think it's unlikely to be a corrupt index,
because the customer said that he dropped and restored the index, and
it's difficult to i
On 2014-02-18 18:10:02 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> > Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >> I've had multiple complaints of apparent data loss on 9.3.2 customer
> >> databases. There are 2 total, both complaints from the past week, one
> >> of wh
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> I've had multiple complaints of apparent data loss on 9.3.2 customer
>> databases. There are 2 total, both complaints from the past week, one
>> of which I was able to confirm. The customer's complaint is that
>> ce
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> That was my first suspicion, but then re-indexing didn't help, while
> VACUUM FREEZE had the immediate effect of making both plans give a
> consistent answer.
I should add that this is an unremarkable int4 primary key (which was
dropped an
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> The multixact bugs would cause tuples to be hidden at the heap level.
> If the tuples are visible in a seqscan, then these are more likely to be
> related to index problems, not multixact problem.
That was my first suspicion, but then re-in
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I've had multiple complaints of apparent data loss on 9.3.2 customer
> databases. There are 2 total, both complaints from the past week, one
> of which I was able to confirm. The customer's complaint is that
> certain rows are either visible or invisible, depending on wheth
