Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos warnings on win32
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 10:55:50PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> The attached file removes this by undefing the macros before we include the > >> kerberos files. But this is perhaps just too ugly to deal with and we > >> should live with the warnings instead? > > > > Ick. I don't like any of these patches. > > You know, I kind of expected that response :-P > > We'll just live with the warnings then, since they're not critical. > Meanwhile, I'll file a bug with the Kerberos folks. For the purpose of the archives, kfw bug 5601. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos warnings on win32
Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The attached file removes this by undefing the macros before we include the >> kerberos files. But this is perhaps just too ugly to deal with and we >> should live with the warnings instead? > > Ick. I don't like any of these patches. You know, I kind of expected that response :-P We'll just live with the warnings then, since they're not critical. Meanwhile, I'll file a bug with the Kerberos folks. //Magnus ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos warnings on win32
Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The attached file removes this by undefing the macros before we include the > kerberos files. But this is perhaps just too ugly to deal with and we > should live with the warnings instead? Ick. I don't like any of these patches. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
