Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO the second point is done but the first is not: there's still a
>> question of whether we could remove the trigger-time checks for equality
>> now that there's an upstream filter. Possibly break the TODO entry
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >> It's listed under
> >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
> >>
> >> I think the main points mentioned there have now a
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> It's listed under https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
>>
>> I think the main points mentioned there have now all been taken care of.
> Ah, got it. Marked as done.
IMO the second poi
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 20:42, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >> On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Any status on this?
> >> >
> >>
> >> Tom took care of it
On 27 August 2012 20:42, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> >
>> > Any status on this?
>> >
>>
>> Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Any status on this?
> >
>
> Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01075.php
>
> I think that todo item can now be
On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Any status on this?
>
Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01075.php
I think that todo item can now be marked as done.
Regards,
Dean
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql
Any status on this?
---
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Vik Reykja wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:25, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> > I decided to take
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:02, Chetan Suttraway <
chetan.suttra...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> The patch was not getting applied. Was seeing below message:
> postgresql$ git apply /Downloads/unchanged.patch
> error: src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c: already exists in working
> directory
>
> Hav
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> > I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following
> post:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
> >
> > The attached patch makes the
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
>
> The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
> naming.
>
> It seeme
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Vik Reykja wrote:
> I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
>
> The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
> naming.
>
> It seem
12 matches
Mail list logo
