Re: [HACKERS] Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)

2012-07-18 Thread Tom Lane
Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au writes: On 07/18/2012 08:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Not sure if we need a whole farm, but certainly having at least one machine testing this sort of stuff on a regular basis would make me feel a lot better. OK. That's something I can actually be useful for.

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)

2012-07-17 Thread Tom Lane
Craig Ringer ring...@ringerc.id.au writes: On 07/18/2012 06:56 AM, Tom Lane wrote: This implies that nobody has done pull-the-plug testing on either HEAD or 9.2 since the checkpointer split went in (2011-11-01) That makes me wonder if on top of the buildfarm, extending some buildfarm

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)

2012-07-17 Thread Craig Ringer
On 07/18/2012 08:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Not sure if we need a whole farm, but certainly having at least one machine testing this sort of stuff on a regular basis would make me feel a lot better. OK. That's something I can actually be useful for. My current qemu/kvm test harness control code