Re: [HACKERS] Use of postmaster

2007-10-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed on our web site shortly. --- Brendan Jurd wrote: On 10/4/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brendan Jurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that we've

Re: [HACKERS] Use of postmaster

2007-10-03 Thread Tom Lane
Brendan Jurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that we've renamed the server binary to postgres, what is the status on use of the name postmaster? Is it now deprecated? And if not, is there any point in keeping it around? I'm certainly not for removing the term from either the code or the

Re: [HACKERS] Use of postmaster

2007-10-03 Thread Ron Mayer
Brendan Jurd wrote: Seems it would be best to apply this nomenclature consistently, and simply drop the name postmaster from use. +1 I agree the term postmaster references in the docs, etc should go away - with perhaps the exception of one faq that say that postmaster's a deprecated name in

Re: [HACKERS] Use of postmaster

2007-10-03 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 10/4/07, Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Brendan Jurd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Now that we've renamed the server binary to postgres, what is the status on use of the name postmaster? Is it now deprecated? And if not, is there any point in keeping it around? We should replace it by