On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:01:56PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:32:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Adrian Vondendriesch writes:
> > > I patched the function conninfo_array_parse() which is used by
> > > PQconnectStartParams to behave like PQsetdbLogin. The patch also
>
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:32:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adrian Vondendriesch writes:
> > I patched the function conninfo_array_parse() which is used by
> > PQconnectStartParams to behave like PQsetdbLogin. The patch also
> > contains a document patch which clarify "unspecified" parameters.
>
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 05:06:08PM +0200, Adrian Vondendriesch wrote:
> Am 01.04.2014 16:32, schrieb Tom Lane:
> > Adrian Vondendriesch writes:
> >> I patched the function conninfo_array_parse() which is used by
> >> PQconnectStartParams to behave like PQsetdbLogin. The patch also
> >> contains a
Am 01.04.2014 16:32, schrieb Tom Lane:
> Adrian Vondendriesch writes:
>> I patched the function conninfo_array_parse() which is used by
>> PQconnectStartParams to behave like PQsetdbLogin. The patch also
>> contains a document patch which clarify "unspecified" parameters.
>
> I see no documentat
Adrian Vondendriesch writes:
> I patched the function conninfo_array_parse() which is used by
> PQconnectStartParams to behave like PQsetdbLogin. The patch also
> contains a document patch which clarify "unspecified" parameters.
I see no documentation update here. I'm also fairly concerned abou
Hi,
Am Wed, 12 Feb 2014 13:47:41 -0500
schrieb Robert Haas :
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jeff Janes
> wrote:
> >> Presumably whatever behavior difference you are seeing is somehow
> >> related to the use of PQconnectdbParams() rather than
> >> PQsetdbLogin(), but the fine manual does not
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Presumably whatever behavior difference you are seeing is somehow
>> related to the use of PQconnectdbParams() rather than PQsetdbLogin(),
>> but the fine manual does not appear to document a different between
>> those functions as regards pas
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> >
> > Since this commit (17676c785a95b2598c573), pgbench no longer uses
> .pgpass to
> > obtain passwords, but instead prompts for a password
> >
> > This problem is in 9.3 and 9.4dev
> >
> >
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Amit Kapila
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Shigeru/Robert,
>> >
>> >> The way fixing oid2name and pgbench seems reasonable, so applying it to
>> >> vacuumlo (as Peter me
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Amit Kapila
> wrote:
> > Hi Shigeru/Robert,
> >
> >> The way fixing oid2name and pgbench seems reasonable, so applying it to
> >> vacuumlo (as Peter mentioned) would be enough for this issue.
> >
> > Shall I c
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> Hi Shigeru/Robert,
>
>> The way fixing oid2name and pgbench seems reasonable, so applying it to
>> vacuumlo (as Peter mentioned) would be enough for this issue.
>
> Shall I consider following 2 points to update the patch:
> 1. Apply changes sim
Hi Shigeru/Robert,
-Original Message-
From: Shigeru HANADA [mailto:shigeru.han...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 6:57 AM
(2012/06/28 11:16), Robert Haas wrote:
>> If it can be done without costing anything meaningful, I don't object,
>> but I would humbly suggest that this is
(2012/06/28 11:16), Robert Haas wrote:
> If it can be done without costing anything meaningful, I don't object,
> but I would humbly suggest that this is not hugely important one way
> or the other. application_name is primarily a monitoring convenience,
> so it's not hugely important to have it s
On fre, 2012-06-08 at 17:14 +, Amit kapila wrote:
> This patch is to provide support for fallback application name for
> contrib/pgbench, oid2name, and dblink.
vacuumlo should also be treated, I think.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 7:46 AM
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Shigeru HANADA
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Robert Haas
wrote:
>> Indeed reparsing connection string is not cheap, but dblink does it for
>> checking password req
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:57 PM, Shigeru HANADA
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> To achieve the same in dblink, we need to parse the passed connection string
>>> and check if it contains fallback_application
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>> To achieve the same in dblink, we need to parse the passed connection string
>> and check if it contains fallback_application_name, if yes then its okay,
>> otherwise we need to append f
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch for Todo Item : Provide
fallback_application_name in contrib/pgbench, oid2name, and dblink
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila
wrote:
>
>> Why not 'dblink'?
>
> We can do for dblink as well. I just wanted to check before implemen
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
>> Why not 'dblink'?
>
> We can do for dblink as well. I just wanted to check before implementing in
> dblink.
>
> I have checked the dblink_connect() function, it receives the connect string
> and used in most cases that string to
> call libp
: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:13 AM
To: Amit Kapila
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch for Todo Item : Provide
fallback_application_name in contrib/pgbench, oid2name, and dblink
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> As per the previous discussion in l
f any of this option is okay or what is other way to get the
program name.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Haas [mailto:robertmh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 12:13 AM
To: Amit Kapila
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP patch for Todo I
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> As per the previous discussion in link below, it seems that fallback
> application name needs to be provided for only
>
> pgbench and oid2name.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/w2g9837222c1004070216u3bc46b3ahbddfdffdbfb46...@mail.g
As per the previous discussion in link below, it seems that fallback
application name needs to be provided for only
pgbench and oid2name.
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/w2g9837222c1004070216u3bc46b3ahbdd
fdffdbfb46...@mail.gmail.com
However the title of Todo Item suggests it needs
23 matches
Mail list logo
