On Aug11, 2011, at 09:16 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2011-07-29 at 11:37 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> On Jul28, 2011, at 22:51 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On ons, 2011-07-27 at 23:21 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
On Jul27, 2011, at 23:08 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Well, offhand
On fre, 2011-07-29 at 11:37 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Jul28, 2011, at 22:51 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On ons, 2011-07-27 at 23:21 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> >> On Jul27, 2011, at 23:08 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >>> Well, offhand I would expect that passing an XML value to XMLATTRIBU
On Jul28, 2011, at 22:51 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-07-27 at 23:21 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> On Jul27, 2011, at 23:08 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Well, offhand I would expect that passing an XML value to XMLATTRIBUTES
>>> would behave as in
>>>
>>> SELECT XMLELEMENT(NAME "t",
On ons, 2011-07-27 at 23:21 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Jul27, 2011, at 23:08 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Well, offhand I would expect that passing an XML value to XMLATTRIBUTES
> > would behave as in
> >
> > SELECT XMLELEMENT(NAME "t", XMLATTRIBUTES(XMLSERIALIZE(content '&'::XML
> > AS te
On Jul27, 2011, at 23:08 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Well, offhand I would expect that passing an XML value to XMLATTRIBUTES
> would behave as in
>
> SELECT XMLELEMENT(NAME "t", XMLATTRIBUTES(XMLSERIALIZE(content '&'::XML
> AS text) AS "a"))
With both 9.1 and 9.2 this query returns
xmlelem
On ons, 2011-07-27 at 19:37 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> > Per SQL standard, the attribute values may not be of type XML, so
> maybe
> > we should just prohibit it.
>
> We probably should have, but I think it's too late for that. I don't
> believe I'm the only one who uses XPATH results as attrib
On Jul27, 2011, at 16:18 , Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tis, 2011-07-26 at 22:44 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> While reviewing the (now applied) XPATH escaping patches, Radoslaw
>> found one
>> case where the previous failure of XPATH to escape its return value
>> was offset
>> by XMLATTRIBUTES in
On tis, 2011-07-26 at 22:44 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> While reviewing the (now applied) XPATH escaping patches, Radoslaw
> found one
> case where the previous failure of XPATH to escape its return value
> was offset
> by XMLATTRIBUTES insistence to escape all input values, even if
> they're
> a
