On 10/29/16 4:31 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> tl;dr: It's critical that you actually do a make install, or at least it
> is if you've set --prefix with configure. If you don't, then even if you
> do make check you'le going to get the *installed* libpq, and not the
> *built* libpq.
I was not able to r
On 10/29/16 3:31 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
tl;dr: It's critical that you actually do a make install, or at least it
is if you've set --prefix with configure. If you don't, then even if you
do make check you'le going to get the *installed* libpq, and not the
*built* libpq.
Actually, sometimes that is
tl;dr: It's critical that you actually do a make install, or at least it
is if you've set --prefix with configure. If you don't, then even if you
do make check you'le going to get the *installed* libpq, and not the
*built* libpq.
Also, looks like there's a race between the .info and .c.gcov ta
On 10/27/16 1:27 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Well, that got me closer, but it's still blowing up on libpq:
>
> genhtml: ERROR: no valid records found in tracefile
> ./src/interfaces/libpq/lcov.info
I have seen similar problems when I use a gcov that does not match the gcc.
I was able to run it succe
On 10/27/16 12:27 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
I've attached a build log if anyone wants to take a look...
BTW, while the log shows Apple's make in use I also tried with gmake out
of macports with the same results.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics,
On 10/14/16 11:50 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 10/13/16 11:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 10/13/16 4:03 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
>>> I've slowly stripped away my normal build environment; I'm now using
>>> baseline gcc (no ccache) with the following ./configure... anyone have
>>> any ideas how to de
On 10/13/16 11:13 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 10/13/16 4:03 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
I've slowly stripped away my normal build environment; I'm now using
baseline gcc (no ccache) with the following ./configure... anyone have
any ideas how to debug/fix this?
Which gcc are you using?
gcc --vers
On 10/13/16 4:03 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> I've slowly stripped away my normal build environment; I'm now using
> baseline gcc (no ccache) with the following ./configure... anyone have
> any ideas how to debug/fix this?
Which gcc are you using?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadr
