On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:09 PM, David Rowley
wrote:
> On 5 April 2016 at 11:59, Robert Haas wrote:
>> One of my EDB colleagues, while in the process of refactoring some
>> unrelated Advanced Server code, discovered that (1) there's no way to
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:26 PM, David Rowley
wrote:
> Does this need to check the parallel flags on the transfn or serialfn?
> these'll be executed on the worker process. Possibly we also need the
> combinefn/deserialfn/finalfn to be checked too as I see that we do
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> One of my EDB colleagues, while in the process of refactoring some
>> unrelated Advanced Server code, discovered that (1) there's no way to
>> mark an aggregate as anything other
Robert Haas writes:
> One of my EDB colleagues, while in the process of refactoring some
> unrelated Advanced Server code, discovered that (1) there's no way to
> mark an aggregate as anything other than parallel-unsafe but (2) it
> doesn't matter because
On 5 April 2016 at 13:09, David Rowley wrote:
> On 5 April 2016 at 11:59, Robert Haas wrote:
>> One of my EDB colleagues, while in the process of refactoring some
>> unrelated Advanced Server code, discovered that (1) there's no way to
>> mark
On 5 April 2016 at 11:59, Robert Haas wrote:
> One of my EDB colleagues, while in the process of refactoring some
> unrelated Advanced Server code, discovered that (1) there's no way to
> mark an aggregate as anything other than parallel-unsafe but (2) it
> doesn't matter