On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:25:55AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 02/19/2012 08:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> >>On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> pg_re
On 02/19/2012 08:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
What exactly do you mean by "ignore
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
>>
>> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
>>
On Sun, February 19, 2012 06:27, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
>
> What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
> standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
> pg_restore ignores environment variable PGDATABASE.
What exactly do you mean by "ignores"? pg_restore prints results to
standard output unless a database name is specified. AFAIK, there's
no syntax to say "I want a direct-to-database resto