Le 18 févr. 2011 à 08:26, Tom Lane a écrit :
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= writes:
>> Le 12 févr. 2011 à 18:51, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
>>> It's only failing on this one machine, but there isn't anything
>>> platform-specific in this code, so I'd look for memory management faults
>>> on the
=?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Zara?= writes:
> Le 12 févr. 2011 à 18:51, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
>> It's only failing on this one machine, but there isn't anything
>> platform-specific in this code, so I'd look for memory management faults
>> on the code or a compiler problem. Try with lower optimizat
Le 14 févr. 2011 à 19:27, Rémi Zara a écrit :
>
> Le 12 févr. 2011 à 18:51, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
>
>>
>> It's only failing on this one machine, but there isn't anything
>> platform-specific in this code, so I'd look for memory management faults
>> on the code or a compiler problem. Try
Le 14 févr. 2011 à 19:27, Rémi Zara a écrit :
>
> Le 12 févr. 2011 à 18:51, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
>
>>
>> It's only failing on this one machine, but there isn't anything
>> platform-specific in this code, so I'd look for memory management faults
>> on the code or a compiler problem. Try
Le 12 févr. 2011 à 18:51, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
> On lör, 2011-02-12 at 13:34 +0100, Rémi Zara wrote:
>> Since the per-column collation patch went in, pika (NetBSD 5.1/mips) started
>> failing consistently with this diff:
>>
>> ***
>> /home/pgbuildfarm/workdir/HEAD/pgsql.15101/src/test/re
On lör, 2011-02-12 at 13:34 +0100, Rémi Zara wrote:
> Since the per-column collation patch went in, pika (NetBSD 5.1/mips) started
> failing consistently with this diff:
>
> ***
> /home/pgbuildfarm/workdir/HEAD/pgsql.15101/src/test/regress/expected/polymorphism.out
> Sat Feb 12 02:16:07 201
