Re: Allocations in critical section (was Re: [HACKERS] WAL format and API changes (9.5))

2014-04-04 Thread Tom Lane
Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com writes: Ok, I fixed the issues that the assertion fixed. I also committed a patch to add the assertion itself; let's see if the buildfarm finds more cases that violate the rule. It ignores the checkpointer, because it's known to violate the rule,

Re: Allocations in critical section (was Re: [HACKERS] WAL format and API changes (9.5))

2014-04-04 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 04/04/2014 04:56 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com writes: Ok, I fixed the issues that the assertion fixed. I also committed a patch to add the assertion itself; let's see if the buildfarm finds more cases that violate the rule. It ignores the checkpointer,