On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Josh Kupershmidt schmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In theory, we have
documentation that explains this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide-toolsets.html
While we're on the
On mån, 2011-04-04 at 15:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
AFAICT, the biggest problem with our existing toolchain is that it's
hard for some people to get it working. In theory, we have
documentation that explains this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide-toolsets.html
On mån, 2011-04-04 at 15:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
One thing I'd like to know is whether docbook v5 is any more
portable/easier to install.
I don't see why. It's just a newer version of the same thing.
If you change the sources to XML and switch to the XSL toolchain, you
don't have to install
Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of lun abr 04 16:47:26 -0400 2011:
Il 04/04/11 22:26, Robert Haas ha scritto:
I think you still need to update Solution.pm to match.
Here it is, including change of 3 'Id' attributes (I made them lowercase).
Pushed this one also.
--
Álvaro
On mån, 2011-04-04 at 19:26 +0200, Susanne Ebrecht wrote:
Honestly, for German I don't mind yet if it is XML or SGML. XML might
be better in future for maintenance tools.
Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML:
My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore.
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On mån, 2011-04-04 at 15:02 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
AFAICT, the biggest problem with our existing toolchain is that it's
hard for some people to get it working. In theory, we have
documentation that explains this:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I've also had failures, I believe,
from not being connected to the Internet, which is surprising because
it's not at all obvious that building the docs should require an
Internet connection.
Oh, I've run into that and
On tis, 2011-04-05 at 14:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
and I've also had failures, I believe,
from not being connected to the Internet, which is surprising because
it's not at all obvious that building the docs should require an
Internet connection.
I understand this problem, but just to
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On tis, 2011-04-05 at 14:55 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
and I've also had failures, I believe,
from not being connected to the Internet, which is surprising because
it's not at all obvious that building the docs should
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
In theory, we have
documentation that explains this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/docguide-toolsets.html
While we're on the subject..
Attached is a patch against that page suggesting using openjade 1.3,
Gabriele Bartolini gabriele.bartol...@2ndquadrant.it writes:
My intention was to start and change some simple documentation files in
order to make our conversion process from SGML to XML smoother, while
keeping the SGML compatibility of the original documentation intact.
AFAIK, the main
Il 04/04/11 18:37, Tom Lane ha scritto:
AFAIK, the main stumbling block for that is that XML doesn't allow
abbreviated close tags (ie,foowhatever/). Which is something that
we are not likely to give up. So I'm not sure of the point of changing
something as trivial as entity declaration casing.
On 04.04.2011 18:37, Tom Lane wrote:
AFAIK, the main stumbling block for that is that XML doesn't allow
abbreviated close tags (ie,foowhatever/). Which is something that
we are not likely to give up. So I'm not sure of the point of changing
something as trivial as entity declaration casing.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Susanne Ebrecht susa...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore.
Which means - sooner or later a reaction is needed.
Ouch.
Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless,
so maybe we should
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless,
so maybe we should just apply it and move on.
I have no great objection to the patch as such; just wondering what the
roadmap is.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless,
so maybe we should just apply it and move on.
I have no great objection to the patch as such; just wondering what
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Susanne Ebrecht susa...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML:
My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore.
Which means - sooner or later a reaction is needed.
Yes, indeed.
I don't think that during
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Susanne Ebrecht susa...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML:
My information is that DocBook 5.0 won't support SGML anymore.
Which means -
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com wrote:
There are arguments as to why to switch to version 5, which is,
indeed, XML-only.
http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch01.html#introduction-why-to-switch
AFAICT, the
On 4/4/11, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Browne cbbro...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Susanne Ebrecht susa...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Anyway, I figured out there is another argument for XML:
My information is that
On 04.04.2011 21:08, Tom Lane wrote:
Indeed. One thing I'd like to know is whether docbook v5 is any more
portable/easier to install
Unfortunately, as far as I know - there isn't a huge difference.
regards,
Susanne
--
Susanne Ebrecht - 2ndQuadrant
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support,
Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of lun abr 04 13:18:21 -0400 2011:
Il 04/04/11 18:37, Tom Lane ha scritto:
AFAIK, the main stumbling block for that is that XML doesn't allow
abbreviated close tags (ie,foowhatever/). Which is something that
we are not likely to give up. So I'm
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of lun abr 04 13:18:21 -0400 2011:
Il 04/04/11 18:37, Tom Lane ha scritto:
AFAIK, the main stumbling block for that is that XML doesn't allow
abbreviated close tags
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun abr 04 16:26:07 -0400 2011:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Gabriele Bartolini's message of lun abr 04 13:18:21 -0400
2011:
Il 04/04/11 18:37, Tom Lane ha scritto:
AFAIK, the main
Il 04/04/11 22:26, Robert Haas ha scritto:
I think you still need to update Solution.pm to match.
Here it is, including change of 3 'Id' attributes (I made them lowercase).
Thanks,
Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini - 2ndQuadrant Italia
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
25 matches
Mail list logo
