Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was reported on pg_lesslog. So far, I found it's
a bug in pg_compresslog. Please do not use pg_compresslog and
pg_decompresslog until improved version is uploaded.
I
Thank you very much for the advice. Yes I think it should go to
announce. I will post a message.
--
Koichi Suzuki
2010/2/12 Karl Denninger k...@denninger.net:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 23:39 +0900, Koichi Suzuki wrote:
Dear Folks;
A very serious bug was
In addition, in the fix, I'm thinking I should add at least the
following check mechanism;
1. Check XNOOP record size to match the original WAL record.
2. Restore WAL segment at the time of pg_compress, compare restored
WAL with the original and check it is safe to use in the restoration,
both
