Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

2004-04-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Not sure if anyone reported to you but we fixed these in current CVS and will have the fix in 7.4.3. --- Cott Lang wrote: On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 16:25, Bruce Momjian wrote: Sure, shoot them over to hackers or patches.

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

2004-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Would someone review these problems and submit a patch? Thanks. --- Tom Lane wrote: Cott Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If the number of tuples is sufficiently high, pg reports 'reltuples' back in TABLE_STATS_QUERY in

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

2004-02-11 Thread Matthew T. O'Connor
Yeah, I'll take a look at it and submit a patch. Sorry I didn't see it sooner, but I don't read the bugs mailing list. On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 17:29, Bruce Momjian wrote: Would someone review these problems and submit a patch? Thanks.

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

2004-02-11 Thread Cott Lang
I have my original changes + Tom's recommended changes applied to 7.4.1 if you're interested. On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 15:57, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: Yeah, I'll take a look at it and submit a patch. Sorry I didn't see it sooner, but I don't read the bugs mailing list. On Wed, 2004-02-11 at

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

2004-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Cott Lang wrote: I have my original changes + Tom's recommended changes applied to 7.4.1 if you're interested. Sure, shoot them over to hackers or patches. The pg_autovacuum author is looking into this. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Bug in pg_autovacuum ?

2004-02-11 Thread Cott Lang
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 16:25, Bruce Momjian wrote: Sure, shoot them over to hackers or patches. The pg_autovacuum author is looking into this. Here they are. They've worked well for me, but someone wiser in the ways of C should certainly look them over. :) ? autovac.patch ? pg_autovacuum