Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Rader, David wrote: > Revised doc patch attached with various parameters. Committed. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Rader, David wrote: > > Attached is a doc patch that updates the documentation for postgres-fdw > to > > include the actual values for the 4 session variables that

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?

On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:28 AM, Rader, David wrote: > Attached is a doc patch that updates the documentation for postgres-fdw to > include the actual values for the 4 session variables that are set. Does > that make sense to clarify? >From my point of view, this would be a

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] Seems bug in postgres_fdw?

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:10 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Sachin Kotwal writes: > > Here , Why postgresql takes different time when remote table and foreign > > table have different definition for timestamp column? > > I believe postgres_fdw sets the timezone