Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:49 PM Dang Minh Huong wrote:
To: Amit Kapila
Subject: Re: [BUGS] replication_timeout not effective
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:49 PM
Hi,
Thank you for your soon reply.
I'm trying to set the network timeout related parameters to terminate
it.
# i've
Hi Amit,
Thank you for your consideration.
My project not allows to use 9.2 or 9.3.
In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
So if it is solved in 9.3 i think there is a way to terminate it.
I hope it is fixed in 9.1 soon
Regards,
2013/04/10 18:33、Amit Kapila
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong kakalo...@gmail.com wrote:
In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
So if it is solved in 9.3 i think there is a way to terminate it.
I hope it is fixed in 9.1 soon
Hmm. He said that,
But in my
On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong kakalo...@gmail.com wrote:
In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
So if it is solved in 9.3 i think there is a way to terminate it.
I hope it
Thanks all,
(2013/04/10 22:55), Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong kakalo...@gmail.com wrote:
In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is replaced by wal_sender_timeout.
So if it is solved in 9.3 i
On 2013-04-10 23:37:44 +0900, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
Thanks all,
(2013/04/10 22:55), Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong kakalo...@gmail.com
wrote:
In 9.3, it sounds replication_timeout is
2013/04/10 23:44、Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com のメッセージ:
On 2013-04-10 23:37:44 +0900, Dang Minh Huong wrote:
Thanks all,
(2013/04/10 22:55), Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-04-10 22:38:07 +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Dang Minh Huong
