On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I don't have a problem with getting rid of those, it's easy enough to
register them inside the worker and it's safe since we start with
blocked signals. I seem to remember some discussion about why they were
added
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we have consensus to back-patch the other API changes as well.
I'll work up a patch for that.
Pushed that as well.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The changes here make it impossible to write a bgworker which properly
works in 9.3 and 9.4. Was that intended? If so, the commit message
should mention the compatibility break...
Yeah, sorry, I probably should have
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Andres Freund and...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The changes here make it impossible to write a bgworker which properly
works in 9.3 and 9.4. Was that intended? If so, the commit message
