David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Done:
o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say IN when it's an IN parameter?
Right now, it stays silent.
[ Moved to
Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Done:
o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say IN when it's an IN parameter?
Right now, it
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 06:07:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 03:20:51PM -0300, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Log Message:
---
Done:
o -Display IN, INOUT, and OUT parameters in \df
Oops! Should I change the patch to say
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 06:07:01PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
[ Moved to hackers.] No idea. Comments?
I'm thinking no. Parameters by default are unnamed IN parameters,
so I exposed and marked things which differed from that. :)
I agree; the patch
