Neil Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 17:29 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, and put in standard
boilerplate, with approval of author.
You missed a few:
src/pl/tcl/pltcl.c
src/pl/tcl/license.terms
src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c
I'd fix
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Remove Jan Wieck's name from copyrights, and put in standard
boilerplate, with approval of author.
I really don't see why or how this is an improvement. But if no one
else cares about it, so be it ...
I wonder what would have happened if I had stuck my name in the
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wonder what would have happened if I had stuck my name in the
autovacuum.c, pg_shdepend.c or multixact.c files
We would have asked you for permission to change it to the standard
project copyright.
The plpgsql and pltcl files date from a time when we
Seeing that now you're working for a company that depends on the ability
to redistribute the PG code commercially, I would think you'd be all for
making sure that the legalities are nicely lined up. Do you really want
to dig through the source tree at every release to see whether you can
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not sure, but I think that Alvaro's point is the copyright
doesn't matter in this instance. It is the license that does.
Certainly, but if the file says Copyright PostgreSQL Global Development
Group then it's reasonable to assume that the intended
On Thursday 09 March 2006 20:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not sure, but I think that Alvaro's point is the copyright
doesn't matter in this instance. It is the license that does.
Certainly, but if the file says Copyright PostgreSQL Global Development
Robert Treat wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 20:16, Tom Lane wrote:
Joshua D. Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not sure, but I think that Alvaro's point is the copyright
doesn't matter in this instance. It is the license that does.
Certainly, but if the file says Copyright
