Tom,
we're not able to work on this right now, so go ahead if you have time.
I also wonder why did I get right result :) Just repeated the query:
test=# select count(*) from search_tab where (to_tsvector('german', keywords ) @@
to_tsquery('german', 'ee:* dd:*'));
count
---
123
(1
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su writes:
I also wonder why did I get right result :) Just repeated the query:
test=# select count(*) from search_tab where (to_tsvector('german', keywords
) @@ to_tsquery('german', 'ee:* dd:*'));
count
---
123
(1 row)
Yeah, that case works (though
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su writes:
I also wonder why did I get right result :) Just repeated the query:
test=# select count(*) from search_tab where (to_tsvector('german', keywords ) @@
to_tsquery('german', 'ee:* dd:*'));
count
---
123
(1
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su writes:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah, that case works (though I think it's unnecessarily slow). The one
that gives the wrong answer is the equivalent form with two AND'ed @@
operators.
hmm, that query works too :)
There may be some platform
Oleg Bartunov o...@sai.msu.su writes:
you can download dump http://mira.sai.msu.su/~megera/tmp/search_tab.dump
Hmm ... I'm not sure why you're failing to reproduce it, because it's
falling over pretty easily for me. After poking at it for awhile,
I am of the opinion that scanGetItem's handling