On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:46:11PM -0500, James Robinson wrote:
Speaking from a non-profit whose enterprise data sits inside postgres,
we would be willing to invest a few thousand dollars into the pot of
synchronous multi-master replication. Postgres-r sounded absolutely
marvelous to us
Speaking from a non-profit whose enterprise data sits inside postgres,
we would be willing to invest a few thousand dollars into the pot of
synchronous multi-master replication. Postgres-r sounded absolutely
marvelous to us back in the day that it was rumored to be one of the
possible
Jan Wieck wrote:
http://developer.postgresql.org/~wieck/slony1.html
Very interesting read. Nice work!
We want to build this system as a community project. The plan was from
the beginning to release the product under the BSD license. And we think
it is best to start it as such and to ask for
On Nov 11, 2003, at 12:11 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
http://developer.postgresql.org/~wieck/slony1.html
Very interesting read. Nice work!
Ditto. I'll read it a bit closer later, but after a quick read it
seems quite complete and well thought out. I especially like
that sequences
Joe Conway wrote:
Jan Wieck wrote:
http://developer.postgresql.org/~wieck/slony1.html
Very interesting read. Nice work!
We want to build this system as a community project. The plan was from
the beginning to release the product under the BSD license. And we think
it is best to start it as such
Jan Wieck wrote:
If you mean to configure the system to replicate rows to different
destinations (slaves) based on arbitrary qualifications, no. I had
thought about it, but it does not really fit into the datacenter and
failover picture, so it is not required to meet the goals and adds
