Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] autoanalyze criteria

2013-07-05 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > On 24/02/13 10:51, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> >> On 24/02/13 10:12, Stefan Andreatta wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 02/23/2013 09:30 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: Moved discussion from General To Hackers. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Ste

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] autoanalyze criteria

2013-05-14 Thread Mark Kirkwood
On 24/02/13 10:51, Mark Kirkwood wrote: On 24/02/13 10:12, Stefan Andreatta wrote: On 02/23/2013 09:30 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: Moved discussion from General To Hackers. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Andreatta mailto:s.andrea...@synedra.com>> wrote: On 02/23/2013 05:10 PM, Jeff

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] autoanalyze criteria

2013-02-23 Thread Mark Kirkwood
On 24/02/13 10:12, Stefan Andreatta wrote: On 02/23/2013 09:30 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: Moved discussion from General To Hackers. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Andreatta mailto:s.andrea...@synedra.com>> wrote: On 02/23/2013 05:10 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: Sorry, I got tunnel vi

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] autoanalyze criteria

2013-02-23 Thread Stefan Andreatta
On 02/23/2013 09:30 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: Moved discussion from General To Hackers. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Andreatta mailto:s.andrea...@synedra.com>> wrote: On 02/23/2013 05:10 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: Sorry, I got tunnel vision about the how the threshold was c

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] autoanalyze criteria

2013-02-23 Thread Jeff Janes
Moved discussion from General To Hackers. On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Stefan Andreatta wrote: > > On 02/23/2013 05:10 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: > > > Sorry, I got tunnel vision about the how the threshold was computed, and > forgot about the thing it was compared to. There is a "secret" data p