On 23 February 2016 at 22:46, Tom Lane wrote:
> Craig Ringer writes:
> > On 23 February 2016 at 21:34, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> I believe Sridhar is imagining that someday "set autocommit to false"
> >> might be a command that the server would understand.
>
> > ... I guess. Yeah.
>
> We've been
Craig Ringer writes:
> On 23 February 2016 at 21:34, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I believe Sridhar is imagining that someday "set autocommit to false"
>> might be a command that the server would understand.
> ... I guess. Yeah.
We've been there, we've done that. We're not doing it again.
Cf commits
On 23 February 2016 at 21:34, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Craig Ringer
> wrote:
> >> currently PostgreSQL::"set autocommit to FALSE ( not supported )
> >
> > This also does not make any sense.
> >
> > PgJDBC does support turning autocommit off. So I don't know in what w
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> currently PostgreSQL::"set autocommit to FALSE ( not supported )
>
> This also does not make any sense.
>
> PgJDBC does support turning autocommit off. So I don't know in what way it's
> "not supported".
I believe Sridhar is imagining that s
On 20 February 2016 at 12:40, Sridhar N Bamandlapally wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I understand your point,
>
> may be I didn't understand everyone or everyone didn't understand me
>
Sounds like it.
> one feature of PostgreSQL is implemented into another feature of Java ( i
> say subject PostgreSQL::au
Hi All
I understand your point,
may be I didn't understand everyone or everyone didn't understand me
one feature of PostgreSQL is implemented into another feature of Java ( i
say subject PostgreSQL::autocommit Vs JDBC::setAutoCommit ),
i.e PostgreSQL::"set autocommit to FALSE" is implemented as
