Quoting Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net:
It would be nice to make XMLEXISTS work as in the standard, seeing how
many others are providing the same interface.
...
I think providing XPath is enough, at least for now.
Hi Peter,
From piecing together sections 8.4 (XML exists predicate) and
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-05-26 at 11:47 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
The XMLEXISTS function works with XQuery expressions and doesn't have
the call signature that your patch implements
Looking at the manuals of Oracle, Derby and DB2 I see how the call
signature differs. I
Mike Fowler wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
We're unlikely to accept this patch if it changes the minimum version
of libxml2 required to compile PostgreSQL
Why?
Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
We're unlikely to accept this patch if it changes the minimum version
of libxml2 required to compile PostgreSQL
Why? 2.6.27 is almost 4 years old.
On tis, 2010-05-25 at 15:31 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
I've been reading the SQL/XML standard and discovered that it defines a
function named XMLEXISTS that does exactly what the todo item
xpath_exists defines. My original patch named the function as per the
todo but I think using the
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On tis, 2010-05-25 at 15:31 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
I've been reading the SQL/XML standard and discovered that it defines a
function named XMLEXISTS that does exactly what the todo item
xpath_exists defines. My original patch named the function as per the
todo but
On ons, 2010-05-26 at 11:47 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
The XMLEXISTS function works with XQuery expressions and doesn't have
the call signature that your patch implements
Looking at the manuals of Oracle, Derby and DB2 I see how the call
signature differs. I also note that Oracle's
I've been reading the SQL/XML standard and discovered that it defines a
function named XMLEXISTS that does exactly what the todo item
xpath_exists defines. My original patch named the function as per the
todo but I think using the function name from the standard is a better
idea. So this patch
On Tue, May 25, 2010 16:31, Mike Fowler wrote:
I've been reading the SQL/XML standard and discovered that it defines a
function named XMLEXISTS that does exactly what the todo item
xpath_exists defines. My original patch named the function as per the
todo but I think using the function name
Erik Rijkers wrote:
libxml2.x86_64 2.6.26-2.1.2.8 installed
libxml2-devel.x86_642.6.26-2.1.2.8 installed
Thanks for testing my patch Erik. It turns out I've got libxml2
installed at version 2.7.5. Searching the gnome mailing lists, it turns
out xmlXPathCompiledEvalToBoolean
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
Erik Rijkers wrote:
libxml2.x86_64 2.6.26-2.1.2.8 installed
libxml2-devel.x86_64 2.6.26-2.1.2.8 installed
Thanks for testing my patch Erik. It turns out I've got libxml2 installed at
version 2.7.5.
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
Erik Rijkers wrote:
libxml2.x86_64 2.6.26-2.1.2.8 installed
libxml2-devel.x86_642.6.26-2.1.2.8 installed
Thanks for testing my patch Erik. It turns out I've got libxml2
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
We're unlikely to accept this patch if it changes the minimum version
of libxml2 required to compile PostgreSQL
Why? 2.6.27 is almost 4 years old.
Because we work hard to minimize our dependencies and make them as
On 05/25/2010 01:09 PM, Mike Fowler wrote:
Why? 2.6.27 is almost 4 years old.
RHEL 5 ships with 2.6.26. I imagine that supporting it is very
desirable, regardless of its age, since that is unfortunately still the
latest version of RHEL.
-- m. tharp
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
We're unlikely to accept this patch if it changes the minimum version
of libxml2 required to compile PostgreSQL
Why? 2.6.27 is almost 4 years old.
Because we work hard to minimize our
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Mike Fowler m...@mlfowler.com wrote:
We're unlikely to accept this patch if it changes the minimum version
of libxml2 required to compile PostgreSQL
Why? 2.6.27 is almost 4 years old.
Because we work hard to
16 matches
Mail list logo