On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Aleksander Alekseev writes:
>> Suggested patch (first of many, I hope) renames `md5Salt` to more
>> general `pwsalt`.
>> Does it sound reasonable?
>
> I'm dubious. The main problem with supposing
Aleksander Alekseev writes:
> Suggested patch (first of many, I hope) renames `md5Salt` to more
> general `pwsalt`.
> Does it sound reasonable?
I'm dubious. The main problem with supposing that port->md5Salt
can serve other purposes is its fixed size. I think you're
Hello.
Since there are plans/efforts to introduce additional authorization
methods in nearest feature I suggest to refactor the code so it
wouldn't mention md5 when it possible. `md5Salt` for instance could be
not only "md5 salt" but also "sha2 salt", etc - depending on what
authorization method