Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-07-07 Thread Jeevan Chalke
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:

 Jeevan Chalke jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com writes:
  Attached patch which fixes my review comments.

 Applied with minor adjustments (mostly cosmetic, but did neither of you
 notice the compiler warning?)


Oops. Sorry for that.
Added  -Wall -Werror in my configuration.

Thanks


 regards, tom lane




-- 
Jeevan B Chalke
Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
Jeevan Chalke jeevan.cha...@enterprisedb.com writes:
 Attached patch which fixes my review comments.

Applied with minor adjustments (mostly cosmetic, but did neither of you
notice the compiler warning?)

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-06-04 Thread Jeevan Chalke
Hi,

Attached patch which fixes my review comments.

Since code changes were good, just fixed reported cosmetic changes.

David, can you please cross check?

Thanks
-- 
Jeevan B Chalke
Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
diff --git a/contrib/tsearch2/tsearch2.c b/contrib/tsearch2/tsearch2.c
index 143dabb..4354c5b 100644
--- a/contrib/tsearch2/tsearch2.c
+++ b/contrib/tsearch2/tsearch2.c
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ tsa_tsearch2(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 		tgargs[i + 1] = trigger-tgargs[i];
 
 	tgargs[1] = pstrdup(GetConfigOptionByName(default_text_search_config,
-			  NULL));
+			  NULL, false));
 	tgargs_old = trigger-tgargs;
 	trigger-tgargs = tgargs;
 	trigger-tgnargs++;
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
index c6e3540..7f6c4ad 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
@@ -16435,7 +16435,7 @@ SELECT collation for ('foo' COLLATE de_DE);
 indexterm
  primarycurrent_setting/primary
 /indexterm
-literalfunctioncurrent_setting(parametersetting_name/parameter)/function/literal
+literalfunctioncurrent_setting(parametersetting_name/parameter [, parametermissing_ok/parameter ])/function/literal
/entry
entrytypetext/type/entry
entryget current value of setting/entry
@@ -16474,7 +16474,9 @@ SELECT collation for ('foo' COLLATE de_DE);
 The function functioncurrent_setting/function yields the
 current value of the setting parametersetting_name/parameter.
 It corresponds to the acronymSQL/acronym command
-commandSHOW/command.  An example:
+commandSHOW/command.  If parametersetting/parameter does not exist,
+throws an error unless parametermissing_ok/parameter is
+literaltrue/literal.  An example:
 programlisting
 SELECT current_setting('datestyle');
 
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
index b3c9f14..a43925d 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
@@ -7137,7 +7137,7 @@ ExtractSetVariableArgs(VariableSetStmt *stmt)
 		case VAR_SET_VALUE:
 			return flatten_set_variable_args(stmt-name, stmt-args);
 		case VAR_SET_CURRENT:
-			return GetConfigOptionByName(stmt-name, NULL);
+			return GetConfigOptionByName(stmt-name, NULL, false);
 		default:
 			return NULL;
 	}
@@ -7206,7 +7206,7 @@ set_config_by_name(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 			 true, 0, false);
 
 	/* get the new current value */
-	new_value = GetConfigOptionByName(name, NULL);
+	new_value = GetConfigOptionByName(name, NULL, false);
 
 	/* Convert return string to text */
 	PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(new_value));
@@ -7633,7 +7633,7 @@ GetPGVariableResultDesc(const char *name)
 		const char *varname;
 
 		/* Get the canonical spelling of name */
-		(void) GetConfigOptionByName(name, varname);
+		(void) GetConfigOptionByName(name, varname, false);
 
 		/* need a tuple descriptor representing a single TEXT column */
 		tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(1, false);
@@ -7656,7 +7656,7 @@ ShowGUCConfigOption(const char *name, DestReceiver *dest)
 	char	   *value;
 
 	/* Get the value and canonical spelling of name */
-	value = GetConfigOptionByName(name, varname);
+	value = GetConfigOptionByName(name, varname, false);
 
 	/* need a tuple descriptor representing a single TEXT column */
 	tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(1, false);
@@ -7740,19 +7740,26 @@ ShowAllGUCConfig(DestReceiver *dest)
 }
 
 /*
- * Return GUC variable value by name; optionally return canonical
- * form of name.  Return value is palloc'd.
+ * Return GUC variable value by name; optionally return canonical form of
+ * name.  If the GUC is unset, then throw an error unless missing_ok is true,
+ * in which case return NULL.  Return value is palloc'd.
  */
 char *
-GetConfigOptionByName(const char *name, const char **varname)
+GetConfigOptionByName(const char *name, const char **varname, bool missing_ok)
 {
 	struct config_generic *record;
 
 	record = find_option(name, false, ERROR);
 	if (record == NULL)
+	{
+		if (missing_ok)
+			return NULL;
+
 		ereport(ERROR,
 (errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
 			   errmsg(unrecognized configuration parameter \%s\, name)));
+	}
+
 	if ((record-flags  GUC_SUPERUSER_ONLY)  !superuser())
 		ereport(ERROR,
 (errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE),
@@ -8046,12 +8053,42 @@ show_config_by_name(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
 	varname = TextDatumGetCString(PG_GETARG_DATUM(0));
 
 	/* Get the value */
-	varval = GetConfigOptionByName(varname, NULL);
+	varval = GetConfigOptionByName(varname, NULL, false);
+
+	/* Convert to text */
+	PG_RETURN_TEXT_P(cstring_to_text(varval));
+}
+
+/*
+ * show_config_by_name_missing_ok - equiv to SHOW X command but implemented as
+ * a function.  If X does not exist, suppress the error and just return NULL
+ * if missing_ok is TRUE.
+ */
+Datum
+show_config_by_name_missing_ok(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
+{
+	char	   *varname;
+	bool   missing_ok;
+	char	   *varval;

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-06-04 Thread Jeevan Chalke
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
make installcheck-world:  tested, failed
Implements feature:   tested, passed
Spec compliant:   tested, passed
Documentation:tested, passed

I have reviewed the patch.
Here are my review comments:

1. Patch does not apply due to some recent changes in pg_proc.h

2. 
-GetConfigOptionByName(const char *name, const char **varname)
+GetConfigOptionByNameMissingOK(const char *name, const char **varname, bool 
missing_ok)

Will it be better if we keep the name as is and change the callers to pass
false for missing_ok parameter?
It looks weired to have an extra #define just to avoid that.
I see countable callers and thus see NO issues changing those.

3. Oid used for new function is already used. Check unused_oids.sh.

4. Changes in builtins.h are accidental. Need to remove that.


However, code changes looks good and implements the desired feature.


The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-05-04 Thread Sameer Thakur
Hello,
Well, speaking of the two-arg form vs alternate name, here's a version of
the patch which includes the new behavior

Thought i will attempt a review.

The patch applies cleanly to latest HEAD.

patch -p1 
/home/Sameer/Downloads/0001-Add-two-arg-form-of-current_setting-to-optionally-su.patch
 
patching file doc/src/sgml/func.sgml
Hunk #1 succeeded at 16216 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 16255 (offset 1 line).
patching file src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 7693 (offset -3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 8012 (offset -3 lines).
patching file src/include/catalog/pg_proc.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 3044 (offset 4 lines).
patching file src/include/utils/builtins.h
patching file src/include/utils/guc.h
patching file src/test/regress/expected/guc.out
patching file src/test/regress/sql/guc.sql

But i do get error at make

make -C catalog schemapg.h
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/Sameer/git/latest_postgres/postgres/src/backend/catalog'
cd ../../../src/include/catalog  '/usr/bin/perl' ./duplicate_oids
3280
make[3]: *** [postgres.bki] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/Sameer/git/latest_postgres/postgres/src/backend/catalog'
make[2]: *** [submake-schemapg] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/home/Sameer/git/latest_postgres/postgres/src/backend'
make[1]: *** [all-backend-recurse] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Sameer/git/latest_postgres/postgres/src'
make: *** [all-src-recurse] Error 2

regards
Sameer



--
View this message in context: 
http://postgresql.nabble.com/PATCH-two-arg-current-setting-with-fallback-tp5842654p5847904.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-03-20 Thread David Christensen

 On Mar 19, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
 
 David Christensen da...@endpoint.com writes:
 The two-arg form of the current_setting() function will allow a
 fallback value to be returned instead of throwing an error when an
 unknown GUC is provided.  This would come in most useful when using
 custom GUCs; e.g.:
 
  -- errors out if the 'foo.bar' setting is unset
  SELECT current_setting('foo.bar');
 
  -- returns current setting of foo.bar, or 'default' if not set
  SELECT current_setting('foo.bar', 'default')
 
 This would save you having to wrap the use of the function in an
 exception block just to catch and utilize a default setting value
 within a function.
 
 That seems kind of ugly, not least because it assumes that you know
 a value that couldn't be mistaken for a valid value of the GUC.
 (I realize that you are thinking of cases where you want to pretend
 that the GUC has some valid value, but that's not the only use case.)
 
 ISTM, since we don't allow GUCs to have null values, it'd be better to
 define the variant function as returning NULL for no-such-GUC.  Then the
 behavior you want could be achieved by wrapping that in a COALESCE, but
 the behavior of probing whether the GUC is set at all would be achieved
 with an IS NULL test.
 
   regards, tom lane

In that case, the other thought I had here is that we change the function 
signature of current_setting() to be a two-arg form where the second argument 
is a boolean throw_error, with a default argument of true to preserve 
existing semantics, and returning NULL if that argument is false.  However, I'm 
not sure if there are some issues with changing the signature of an existing 
function (e.g., with pg_upgrade, etc.).

My *impression* is that since pg_upgrade rebuilds the system tables for a new 
install it shouldn't be an issue, but not sure if having the same pg_proc OID 
with different values or an alternate pg_proc OID would cause issues down the 
line; anyone know if this is a dead-end?

Regards,

David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
da...@endpoint.com
785-727-1171





-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-03-20 Thread David Christensen

 On Mar 20, 2015, at 11:10 AM, David G. Johnston david.g.johns...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:54 AM, David Christensen da...@endpoint.com 
 wrote:
  In that case, the other thought I had here is that we change the function 
  signature of current_setting() to be a two-arg form where the second 
  argument is a boolean throw_error, with a default argument of true to 
  preserve existing semantics, and returning NULL if that argument is false.  
  However, I'm not sure if there are some issues with changing the signature 
  of an existing function (e.g., with pg_upgrade, etc.).
 
  My *impression* is that since pg_upgrade rebuilds the system tables for a 
  new install it shouldn't be an issue, but not sure if having the same 
  pg_proc OID with different values or an alternate pg_proc OID would cause 
  issues down the line; anyone know if this is a dead-end?
 
 I think if the second argument is defaulted it would be OK.  However
 it might make sense to instead add a new two-argument function and
 leave the existing one-argument function alone, because setting
 default arguments for functions defined in pg_proc.h is kind of a
 chore.
 
 ​Isn't there some other update along this whole error-vs-null choice going 
 around where a separate name was chosen for the new null-returning function 
 instead of adding a boolean switch argument?

Well, speaking of the two-arg form vs alternate name, here's a version of the 
patch which includes the new behavior.  (I couldn't think of a good name to 
expose for an alternate function, but I'm open to suggestions.)

Regards,

David
--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
da...@endpoint.com
785-727-1171




0001-Add-two-arg-form-of-current_setting-to-optionally-su.patch
Description: Binary data

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-03-20 Thread David G. Johnston
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:54 AM, David Christensen da...@endpoint.com
 wrote:
  In that case, the other thought I had here is that we change the
 function signature of current_setting() to be a two-arg form where the
 second argument is a boolean throw_error, with a default argument of true
 to preserve existing semantics, and returning NULL if that argument is
 false.  However, I'm not sure if there are some issues with changing the
 signature of an existing function (e.g., with pg_upgrade, etc.).
 
  My *impression* is that since pg_upgrade rebuilds the system tables for
 a new install it shouldn't be an issue, but not sure if having the same
 pg_proc OID with different values or an alternate pg_proc OID would cause
 issues down the line; anyone know if this is a dead-end?

 I think if the second argument is defaulted it would be OK.  However
 it might make sense to instead add a new two-argument function and
 leave the existing one-argument function alone, because setting
 default arguments for functions defined in pg_proc.h is kind of a
 chore.


​Isn't there some other update along this whole error-vs-null choice going
around where a separate name was chosen for the new null-returning function
instead of adding a boolean switch argument?

​David J.


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-03-20 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:54 AM, David Christensen da...@endpoint.com wrote:
 In that case, the other thought I had here is that we change the function 
 signature of current_setting() to be a two-arg form where the second argument 
 is a boolean throw_error, with a default argument of true to preserve 
 existing semantics, and returning NULL if that argument is false.  However, 
 I'm not sure if there are some issues with changing the signature of an 
 existing function (e.g., with pg_upgrade, etc.).

 My *impression* is that since pg_upgrade rebuilds the system tables for a new 
 install it shouldn't be an issue, but not sure if having the same pg_proc OID 
 with different values or an alternate pg_proc OID would cause issues down the 
 line; anyone know if this is a dead-end?

I think if the second argument is defaulted it would be OK.  However
it might make sense to instead add a new two-argument function and
leave the existing one-argument function alone, because setting
default arguments for functions defined in pg_proc.h is kind of a
chore.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-03-19 Thread David Christensen
Apologies if this is a double-post.

Enclosed is a patch that creates a two-arg current_setting() function.  From 
the commit message:

The two-arg form of the current_setting() function will allow a
fallback value to be returned instead of throwing an error when an
unknown GUC is provided.  This would come in most useful when using
custom GUCs; e.g.:

  -- errors out if the 'foo.bar' setting is unset
  SELECT current_setting('foo.bar');

  -- returns current setting of foo.bar, or 'default' if not set
  SELECT current_setting('foo.bar', 'default')

This would save you having to wrap the use of the function in an
exception block just to catch and utilize a default setting value
within a function.




0001-Add-two-arg-for-of-current_setting-NAME-FALLBACK.patch
Description: Binary data

--
David Christensen
End Point Corporation
da...@endpoint.com
785-727-1171




-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] two-arg current_setting() with fallback

2015-03-19 Thread Tom Lane
David Christensen da...@endpoint.com writes:
 The two-arg form of the current_setting() function will allow a
 fallback value to be returned instead of throwing an error when an
 unknown GUC is provided.  This would come in most useful when using
 custom GUCs; e.g.:

   -- errors out if the 'foo.bar' setting is unset
   SELECT current_setting('foo.bar');

   -- returns current setting of foo.bar, or 'default' if not set
   SELECT current_setting('foo.bar', 'default')

 This would save you having to wrap the use of the function in an
 exception block just to catch and utilize a default setting value
 within a function.

That seems kind of ugly, not least because it assumes that you know
a value that couldn't be mistaken for a valid value of the GUC.
(I realize that you are thinking of cases where you want to pretend
that the GUC has some valid value, but that's not the only use case.)

ISTM, since we don't allow GUCs to have null values, it'd be better to
define the variant function as returning NULL for no-such-GUC.  Then the
behavior you want could be achieved by wrapping that in a COALESCE, but
the behavior of probing whether the GUC is set at all would be achieved
with an IS NULL test.

regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers