Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-25 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:02 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> We need to be careful here, backward-compatibility is critical for >> both the client and the server, or to put it in other words, an >> uptables client should still be able to connect a patched server, and >> vic

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-25 Thread Robbie Harwood
Michael Paquier writes: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> David Steele writes: >>> On 2/10/16 4:06 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: Hello friends, For your consideration, here is a new version of GSSAPI encryption support. For those who prefer, it's also

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-25 Thread David Steele
On 2/25/16 2:08 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> >> Not that I can immediately see. As long as the client and server are >> both patched, everything should work. My process is the same as with >> previous versions of this patchset [0], and th

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-24 Thread Michael Paquier
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > David Steele writes: > >> On 2/15/16 12:45 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >>> David Steele writes: >>> 1) It didn't apply cleanly to HEAD. It did apply cleanly on a455878 which I figured was recent enough for testing. I didn't bisec

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-24 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:45 AM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > David Steele writes: >> On 2/10/16 4:06 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >>> Hello friends, >>> >>> For your consideration, here is a new version of GSSAPI encryption >>> support. For those who prefer, it's also available on my github: >>> https:

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-24 Thread Robbie Harwood
David Steele writes: > On 2/15/16 12:45 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> David Steele writes: >> >>> 1) It didn't apply cleanly to HEAD. It did apply cleanly on a455878 >>> which I figured was recent enough for testing. I didn't bisect to find >>> the exact commit that broke it. >> >> It applied

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-19 Thread David Steele
On 2/15/16 12:45 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: > David Steele writes: > >> 1) It didn't apply cleanly to HEAD. It did apply cleanly on a455878 >> which I figured was recent enough for testing. I didn't bisect to find >> the exact commit that broke it. > > It applied to head of master (57c932475504d

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH v5] GSSAPI encryption support

2016-02-15 Thread Robbie Harwood
David Steele writes: > Hi Robbie, > > On 2/10/16 4:06 PM, Robbie Harwood wrote: >> Hello friends, >> >> For your consideration, here is a new version of GSSAPI encryption >> support. For those who prefer, it's also available on my github: >> https://github.com/frozencemetery/postgres/commit/c92