Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [NOVICE] encoding problems

2008-05-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Smet wrote: I understand your point of view but I really think it's more a regression fix than a behavior change. If I can get other hackers to say we should backpatch we can consider it. Well, 8.3 is already different from 8.2, and a lot of

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [NOVICE] encoding problems

2008-05-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guillaume Smet wrote: I understand your point of view but I really think it's more a regression fix than a behavior change. If I can get other hackers to say we should backpatch we can consider it. Well, 8.3 is already

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [NOVICE] encoding problems

2008-05-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tom Lane wrote: Well, 8.3 is already different from 8.2, and a lot of people will see this particular aspect of it as a regression. I'm okay with backpatching to 8.3 ... though the patch needed rather more testing than you gave it. OK, so Alvaro and

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [NOVICE] encoding problems

2008-05-08 Thread Guillaume Smet
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, we don't change behaviors in back branches unless we get lots of complaints, and we haven't in this case. I suspect it's annoying for a lot of people, just not annoying enough to make them complain about it. I

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] [NOVICE] encoding problems

2008-05-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Guillaume Smet wrote: On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, we don't change behaviors in back branches unless we get lots of complaints, and we haven't in this case. I suspect it's annoying for a lot of people, just not annoying enough to make them